Skip to content
§ 00 What makes us different
Narratives · credibility · agents

Most tools count what was said.
Quantiveo follows the story.

Media monitoring, PR intelligence and news APIs all deliver coverage. Quantiveo delivers what a desk actually needs from it: the story as it moves across the sources telling it, weighted by how much each of those sources can be trusted, read by agents so your analysts do not have to.

Start free See the product
§ 01 The category vs. the newsroom
Matched capabilities · side by side
Monitoring category
Quantiveo
The difference
Unit of analysis
Articles, mentions, clips and sentiment, aggregated across channels.
The narrative: one claim, every outlet covering it, tracked as it emerges, accelerates and fades.
Volume vs. the story.
Who does the reading
A person, working through a dashboard or a daily alert email.
Agents on standing assignments — Watch and Brief — that read the whole wire and deliver to your Alerts inbox and an RSS feed.
A better inbox vs. staff.
Trust
Reach, domain authority and audience numbers as a proxy for quality.
A credibility score from 7 signals, withheld when fewer than 5 are measured; trends weighted by it.
Reach vs. credibility.
Disagreement
Sentiment: positive, negative, neutral.
Perspectives: for each claim, which independent networks assert it, dispute it, or leave it out, and how each side frames it.
Tone vs. who says what.
The claim itself
Left to the reader.
An assessment of whether the cited sources support it — labelled AI-generated, describing the sources and never the subject.
Coverage vs. evidence.

This page describes a category of tools, not a specific vendor.

§ 02 What Quantiveo measures that coverage doesn't
Instrument readouts

Four things you cannot read off a mention count.

Computed continuously against the same news corpus a monitoring tool would surface as articles — and turned into something a desk, or an agent, can act on.

01
weighting per source · per network

Credibility-weighted trends

The trends tab ranks each theme by its change in coverage, its volume and the average credibility of the sources carrying it, so a burst of low-credibility repetition ranks low. In the perspectives, twelve syndicated copies of one story count as one network.

02
trigger +2.6σ / 24h

Momentum you can set an alert on

Coverage velocity is measured against each narrative’s own baseline. A Watch agent fires at the threshold you choose — two sigma over baseline, say — not on a raw article count that means something different for every topic.

03
drift θ = 0.41 rad ↑

Frame drift

The story is not only growing or shrinking; it is changing shape. Drift measures how far a narrative’s framing has moved from where it was, so you see a reframing before the volume confirms it.

04
mcp 23 tools · cited

An answer with its sources attached

Ask AI and the MCP server answer from the same evidence you see on screen and cite the items they read. The same tools are open to your own agents.

§ 03 Who this is for

Desks that decide what to trust, under a deadline.

Communications and PR leads who need to see a narrative move before it moves against them. Competitive and market intelligence analysts drowning in feeds who need defensible, sourced briefs on a cadence. Research, policy and investor-relations desks, and editors who have to verify a claim fast. Anyone who spends more than an hour a day deciding what to read and what to believe.

See also · /product · /pricing · /methodology
36,900+ sources · 21,000+ narratives · 15-minute refresh · Research corpus, September 2026 — measured before the production launch
● Next step

Read the same news as a story, not a feed.

Free to start, no card. Everything described on this page is live in the product today.

Start free Read the methodology